Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 88305
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1988

Abstract

The old performance appraisal system at American Cyanamid Co. had so many detractors it became a target in the company''s effort to find ways to improve employees'' quality of life. An experiment in the Medical Research Division substituted three ratings for the ten in the old review procedure and called for no recommended distribution. The new plan assumed that almost all employees perform capably and conscientiously at their jobs, though in a few cases performance is so impressively good or egregiously bad that it should get special recognition. Supervisors were now encouraged to stress positive instead of negative aspects of each subordinate''s work.

About

Abstract

The old performance appraisal system at American Cyanamid Co. had so many detractors it became a target in the company''s effort to find ways to improve employees'' quality of life. An experiment in the Medical Research Division substituted three ratings for the ten in the old review procedure and called for no recommended distribution. The new plan assumed that almost all employees perform capably and conscientiously at their jobs, though in a few cases performance is so impressively good or egregiously bad that it should get special recognition. Supervisors were now encouraged to stress positive instead of negative aspects of each subordinate''s work.

Related