Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Supplement
-
Reference no. 9-586-043
Subject category: Marketing
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 1986
Version: 28 February 1989
Length: 14 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Presents the second of two cases describing the struggle to find 'the right advertising' for the Dry Idea antiperspirant brand introduced in 1978 by the Gillette Co and its advertising agency, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne (BBDO). The case begins with Gillette's November 1983 decision to stage a bake-off placing BBDO in competition with a second agency to 'cook up' a breakthrough advertising campaign for Dry Idea. It then proceeds to describe the six-month bake-off implementation period, provide a report of bake-off copy test results, and pose the question facing product manager Carole Johnson late in April of 1984: who won the bake-off?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Fortune 500, USD2 billion sales
Other setting(s):
1983-1984

About

Abstract

Presents the second of two cases describing the struggle to find 'the right advertising' for the Dry Idea antiperspirant brand introduced in 1978 by the Gillette Co and its advertising agency, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne (BBDO). The case begins with Gillette's November 1983 decision to stage a bake-off placing BBDO in competition with a second agency to 'cook up' a breakthrough advertising campaign for Dry Idea. It then proceeds to describe the six-month bake-off implementation period, provide a report of bake-off copy test results, and pose the question facing product manager Carole Johnson late in April of 1984: who won the bake-off?

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Fortune 500, USD2 billion sales
Other setting(s):
1983-1984

Related