Subject category:
Marketing
Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing
Version: 28 February 1989
Length: 14 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/47668
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
Presents the second of two cases describing the struggle to find 'the right advertising' for the Dry Idea antiperspirant brand introduced in 1978 by the Gillette Co and its advertising agency, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne (BBDO). The case begins with Gillette's November 1983 decision to stage a bake-off placing BBDO in competition with a second agency to 'cook up' a breakthrough advertising campaign for Dry Idea. It then proceeds to describe the six-month bake-off implementation period, provide a report of bake-off copy test results, and pose the question facing product manager Carole Johnson late in April of 1984: who won the bake-off?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Fortune 500, USD2 billion sales
Other setting(s):
1983-1984
About
Abstract
Presents the second of two cases describing the struggle to find 'the right advertising' for the Dry Idea antiperspirant brand introduced in 1978 by the Gillette Co and its advertising agency, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne (BBDO). The case begins with Gillette's November 1983 decision to stage a bake-off placing BBDO in competition with a second agency to 'cook up' a breakthrough advertising campaign for Dry Idea. It then proceeds to describe the six-month bake-off implementation period, provide a report of bake-off copy test results, and pose the question facing product manager Carole Johnson late in April of 1984: who won the bake-off?
Settings
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Fortune 500, USD2 billion sales
Other setting(s):
1983-1984