Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 83516
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review", 1983
Length: 11 pages

Abstract

Under some circumstances, the informal, unwritten plans of an owner-CEO are appropriate for a business. Under others, the formal, written plans of a CEO and board are what a company needs to operate well. But sometimes neither the minimal nor the full-blown approach to planning works. They may even be harmful. A company can decide whether one of these approaches is appropriate for itself by looking at nine variables: the administrative style and ability of its CEO, the ability of its officers, the complexity of the business, the strength of its competition, the gain that its managers expect planning to bring, the leadership of its CEO, the degree of uncertainty the company faces, how well its managers understand formal planning, and how well it is currently planning its actions.

About

Abstract

Under some circumstances, the informal, unwritten plans of an owner-CEO are appropriate for a business. Under others, the formal, written plans of a CEO and board are what a company needs to operate well. But sometimes neither the minimal nor the full-blown approach to planning works. They may even be harmful. A company can decide whether one of these approaches is appropriate for itself by looking at nine variables: the administrative style and ability of its CEO, the ability of its officers, the complexity of the business, the strength of its competition, the gain that its managers expect planning to bring, the leadership of its CEO, the degree of uncertainty the company faces, how well its managers understand formal planning, and how well it is currently planning its actions.

Related