Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

Competitive theorists have begun exploring competitive behavior that minimizes rivalry and head-to-head confrontation - a competitive style referred to as ''indirect competition''. This theoretical expansion provides a more comprehensive explanation of competitive behavior in the marketplace and offers managers a greater array of competitive options from which to choose. Three kinds of indirect competition discussed are: (1) maintaining a low profile; (2) avoiding head-to-head competition; and (3) redefining the battlefield. While perhaps best exemplified by Chinese business practices, indirect competition is relevant to managers worldwide. The benefits of competing ''unconventionally'' (according to prevailing Western standards) can be numerous and unexpected.

About

Abstract

Competitive theorists have begun exploring competitive behavior that minimizes rivalry and head-to-head confrontation - a competitive style referred to as ''indirect competition''. This theoretical expansion provides a more comprehensive explanation of competitive behavior in the marketplace and offers managers a greater array of competitive options from which to choose. Three kinds of indirect competition discussed are: (1) maintaining a low profile; (2) avoiding head-to-head competition; and (3) redefining the battlefield. While perhaps best exemplified by Chinese business practices, indirect competition is relevant to managers worldwide. The benefits of competing ''unconventionally'' (according to prevailing Western standards) can be numerous and unexpected.

Related