Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. UVA-QA-0626
Published by: Darden Business Publishing
Published in: 2004
Length: 15 pages

Abstract

In the spring of 2004, Google was one of the most-talked-about IPO ideas since Netscape went public in 1995. Bullish investors believed Google could set off a string of successful IPOs following a lull in tech- offering activity since 2000. Executives at Google faced several questions in the following months: Should Google go public? What options did Google have for taking its shares to market? Was the traditional form of book-building necessarily the best course of action? Could a sealed- bid auction (eg, WR Hambrecht''s OpenIPO) yield superior results?

About

Abstract

In the spring of 2004, Google was one of the most-talked-about IPO ideas since Netscape went public in 1995. Bullish investors believed Google could set off a string of successful IPOs following a lull in tech- offering activity since 2000. Executives at Google faced several questions in the following months: Should Google go public? What options did Google have for taking its shares to market? Was the traditional form of book-building necessarily the best course of action? Could a sealed- bid auction (eg, WR Hambrecht''s OpenIPO) yield superior results?

Related