Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: University of California, Berkeley
Published in: "California Management Review", 2002

Abstract

Many participants and observers have analyzed the 1996 Mount Everest tragedy and blamed a host of factors, including the weather, equipment failures, and human error. This article examines the people and events through three theoretical lenses: behavioral decision theory, group dynamics, and complex systems. Factors at each level - individual, group, and organizational system - interacted with one another to cause the tragedy. This analysis provides a framework for understanding and diagnosing large scale organizational failures, and it provides several important lessons for managers making and implementing high stakes decisions within organizations.

About

Abstract

Many participants and observers have analyzed the 1996 Mount Everest tragedy and blamed a host of factors, including the weather, equipment failures, and human error. This article examines the people and events through three theoretical lenses: behavioral decision theory, group dynamics, and complex systems. Factors at each level - individual, group, and organizational system - interacted with one another to cause the tragedy. This analysis provides a framework for understanding and diagnosing large scale organizational failures, and it provides several important lessons for managers making and implementing high stakes decisions within organizations.

Related