Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. CMR185
Published by: University of California, Berkeley
Published in: "California Management Review", 2000

Abstract

The role of American corporations as purchasers of health insurance for their employees has changed dramatically over the past several decades from a passive stance to an aggressive purchasing and policy-making role. The transformation has caused purchasers to question the appropriateness of their health benefit interventions for legal, ethical, and financial reasons. Recent research about the role of ''medical necessity'' in California managed care decision making reveals a number of problems purchasers face and describes solutions recommended by some purchasers to those problems.

About

Abstract

The role of American corporations as purchasers of health insurance for their employees has changed dramatically over the past several decades from a passive stance to an aggressive purchasing and policy-making role. The transformation has caused purchasers to question the appropriateness of their health benefit interventions for legal, ethical, and financial reasons. Recent research about the role of ''medical necessity'' in California managed care decision making reveals a number of problems purchasers face and describes solutions recommended by some purchasers to those problems.

Related