Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. CMR123
Published by: University of California, Berkeley
Published in: "California Management Review", 1998

Abstract

Although most companies confine their operations organizations to restricted, tactical roles, in some of the most successful firms operations has served as the foundation for - indeed, the driver behind - successful strategic attacks and defenses. This is most clearly seen in cases where small companies - although lacking the advantages of size, market position, and proprietary technology - take on big companies and in a relatively short time push their way to industry dominance. In such cases, the key to success often is an operations-based advantage. The peculiar nature of this advantage provides insight into the reasons many former industry leaders did not react more promptly and vigorously to such attacks, and why others, in contrast, were able to defend themselves successfully.

About

Abstract

Although most companies confine their operations organizations to restricted, tactical roles, in some of the most successful firms operations has served as the foundation for - indeed, the driver behind - successful strategic attacks and defenses. This is most clearly seen in cases where small companies - although lacking the advantages of size, market position, and proprietary technology - take on big companies and in a relatively short time push their way to industry dominance. In such cases, the key to success often is an operations-based advantage. The peculiar nature of this advantage provides insight into the reasons many former industry leaders did not react more promptly and vigorously to such attacks, and why others, in contrast, were able to defend themselves successfully.

Related