Subject category:
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Published by:
IBS Case Development Center
Length: 6 pages
Data source: Published sources
Topics:
Morningstar Inc; Joe Mansueto; Conflict of interests; Mutual fund rating agency; Fund performance information; Investment advisor; Mutual Fund Sourcebook; US mutual fund industry; Misguiding investors; Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) USA; Morningstar ratings; Erroneous publication; Quality control procedures; Regulatory investigations; Morningstar Associates PLC
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/54617
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
Morningstar Inc, a leading financial services rating firm in the US, was known for its unbiased information and ratings of mutual funds and stocks to ordinary investors. Besides individual investors, Morningstar''s users consisted of: (1) financial planners and investment professionals; (2) institutions like mutual fund companies, providers of retirement services, stock brokerage firms; and (3) media organisations such as television, newspapers and magazines. This reputation and the company''s credibility were jeopardised when three regulatory investigations were initiated against it in 2004. This case helps in understanding the business model of Morningstar, its various fund rating tools, and the growth strategies it employed to become a leading financial services rating firm. It also provides insights into the regulatory investigations initiated against Morningstar by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. The case offers scope for discussion on whether the regulatory investigations and conflicting interests resulting from its diversification would lead to an erosion of its credibility.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
USD10.2 billion (2003 revenues)
Other setting(s):
1984-2004
About
Abstract
Morningstar Inc, a leading financial services rating firm in the US, was known for its unbiased information and ratings of mutual funds and stocks to ordinary investors. Besides individual investors, Morningstar''s users consisted of: (1) financial planners and investment professionals; (2) institutions like mutual fund companies, providers of retirement services, stock brokerage firms; and (3) media organisations such as television, newspapers and magazines. This reputation and the company''s credibility were jeopardised when three regulatory investigations were initiated against it in 2004. This case helps in understanding the business model of Morningstar, its various fund rating tools, and the growth strategies it employed to become a leading financial services rating firm. It also provides insights into the regulatory investigations initiated against Morningstar by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. The case offers scope for discussion on whether the regulatory investigations and conflicting interests resulting from its diversification would lead to an erosion of its credibility.
Settings
Location:
Industry:
Size:
USD10.2 billion (2003 revenues)
Other setting(s):
1984-2004