Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. CMR095
Published by: University of California, Berkeley
Published in: "California Management Review", 1997

Abstract

An analysis of many highly successful and ''visionary'' companies reveals the existence of corporate cultures that emphasise adherence to company goals and cohesiveness within the group. While such cultures can improve effort, morale, and productivity, they also tend to thwart innovation - limiting not only the expression of ''original'' ideas, but even their production. Research in social psychology suggests that flexibility to changing circumstances and innovation is better served by a ''culture'' that not only tolerates, but welcomes dissent and minority views. Such dissent - even when wrong - stimulates better decision making and innovation. Thus, the proper harnessing of dissent may provide a mechanism for creating unity without uniformity and for igniting the ''spark'' of innovation.

About

Abstract

An analysis of many highly successful and ''visionary'' companies reveals the existence of corporate cultures that emphasise adherence to company goals and cohesiveness within the group. While such cultures can improve effort, morale, and productivity, they also tend to thwart innovation - limiting not only the expression of ''original'' ideas, but even their production. Research in social psychology suggests that flexibility to changing circumstances and innovation is better served by a ''culture'' that not only tolerates, but welcomes dissent and minority views. Such dissent - even when wrong - stimulates better decision making and innovation. Thus, the proper harnessing of dissent may provide a mechanism for creating unity without uniformity and for igniting the ''spark'' of innovation.

Related