Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. 3707
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Published in: "Harvard Business Review - OnPoint", 2000

Abstract

This is an enhanced edition of HBR article 99208, originally published in March / April 1999. HBR OnPoint articles save you time by enhancing an original Harvard Business Review article with an overview and an annotated bibliography. This enables you to scan, absorb, and share the management insights. A gap has existed between the conventional wisdom about how managers work and the actual behavior of effective managers. Business textbooks suggest that managers operate best when they carefully control their time and work within highly structured environments, but observations of real managers indicate that those who do that may be undermining their effectiveness. In this HBR Classic, John Kotter explains that managers who limit their interactions to orderly, focused meetings actually shut themselves off from vital information and relationships. He shows how seemingly wasteful activities like chatting in hallways and having impromptu meetings are, in fact, quite efficient. General managers face two fundamental challenges: (1) figuring out what to do despite an enormous amount of potentially relevant information; and (2) getting things done through a large, diverse set of people despite having little direct control over most of them. To tackle these challenges, effective general managers develop flexible agendas and broad networks of relationships. Their agendas enable them to react opportunistically to the flow of events around them because a common framework guides their decisions about where and when to intervene. And their networks allow them to have quick, pointed conversations that give them influence well beyond their formal chain of command. Originally published in 1982, the article''s ideas about time management are all the more useful for today''s executives. Kotter has added a retrospective commentary on the article''s relevance to current concepts of leadership.

About

Abstract

This is an enhanced edition of HBR article 99208, originally published in March / April 1999. HBR OnPoint articles save you time by enhancing an original Harvard Business Review article with an overview and an annotated bibliography. This enables you to scan, absorb, and share the management insights. A gap has existed between the conventional wisdom about how managers work and the actual behavior of effective managers. Business textbooks suggest that managers operate best when they carefully control their time and work within highly structured environments, but observations of real managers indicate that those who do that may be undermining their effectiveness. In this HBR Classic, John Kotter explains that managers who limit their interactions to orderly, focused meetings actually shut themselves off from vital information and relationships. He shows how seemingly wasteful activities like chatting in hallways and having impromptu meetings are, in fact, quite efficient. General managers face two fundamental challenges: (1) figuring out what to do despite an enormous amount of potentially relevant information; and (2) getting things done through a large, diverse set of people despite having little direct control over most of them. To tackle these challenges, effective general managers develop flexible agendas and broad networks of relationships. Their agendas enable them to react opportunistically to the flow of events around them because a common framework guides their decisions about where and when to intervene. And their networks allow them to have quick, pointed conversations that give them influence well beyond their formal chain of command. Originally published in 1982, the article''s ideas about time management are all the more useful for today''s executives. Kotter has added a retrospective commentary on the article''s relevance to current concepts of leadership.

Related