Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Babson College
Originally published in: 2001
Version: 1 February 2005
Length: 12 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

Few recent events have shaken public confidence in product safety as much as the recall of 6.5 million Firestone tyres in August 2000. The defective tyres made by Bridgestone/Firestone Inc were supplied primarily as original equipment on Ford Motor Company sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and sold as replacement items for SUVs and light trucks. For some consumers, the combination of Firestone tyres and Ford vehicles proved lethal. Accidents involving tread separation and rollovers were blamed for 148 deaths and over 500 injuries. This case is intended for use in undergraduate, graduate, and executive courses in ethics, law, or public relations, chronicles the actions and reactions of the Ford and Firestone, various legislative and regulatory bodies, and the public as the truth emerged.

About

Abstract

Few recent events have shaken public confidence in product safety as much as the recall of 6.5 million Firestone tyres in August 2000. The defective tyres made by Bridgestone/Firestone Inc were supplied primarily as original equipment on Ford Motor Company sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and sold as replacement items for SUVs and light trucks. For some consumers, the combination of Firestone tyres and Ford vehicles proved lethal. Accidents involving tread separation and rollovers were blamed for 148 deaths and over 500 injuries. This case is intended for use in undergraduate, graduate, and executive courses in ethics, law, or public relations, chronicles the actions and reactions of the Ford and Firestone, various legislative and regulatory bodies, and the public as the truth emerged.

Related