Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. SMR45115
Published by: MIT Sloan School of Management
Published in: "MIT Sloan Management Review", 2003
Length: 8 pages

Abstract

Corporate America has spent the last few years in restructuring mode, drastically reorganising processes in order to wring profits from a battered economy. However beneficial these efforts may be to the bottom line, say the authors, a reliance on restructuring has had unintended negative side effects, as hierarchies that once controlled the direction of many companies become less relevant, and loyal employees become increasingly disheartened by disruptive - and often shortsighted - strategies. In response, companies resort to even more restructuring, frequently with less than optimal results. The authors recommend that companies shift away from knee-jerk responses such as restructuring and hierarchy building toward a transformation of established corporate structures, a wider distribution of knowledge, and the use of modern performance-measurement systems and technologies. Citing examples at BP, North Carolina''s Duke Power and WL Gore, the authors claim that only companies developing their advantage upon the agility and flexibility of their processes, people and technologies can build lasting value for their company, customers and employees. Jeffrey A Oxman is a founder and principal with MPact Consulting, a management consultancy focused on business performance improvement, with offices in New York, Chicago and Dublin. Brian D Smith is a senior adviser with TPI Inc, a sourcing- advisory-services firm, with offices in the United States, Europe and Australia.

About

Abstract

Corporate America has spent the last few years in restructuring mode, drastically reorganising processes in order to wring profits from a battered economy. However beneficial these efforts may be to the bottom line, say the authors, a reliance on restructuring has had unintended negative side effects, as hierarchies that once controlled the direction of many companies become less relevant, and loyal employees become increasingly disheartened by disruptive - and often shortsighted - strategies. In response, companies resort to even more restructuring, frequently with less than optimal results. The authors recommend that companies shift away from knee-jerk responses such as restructuring and hierarchy building toward a transformation of established corporate structures, a wider distribution of knowledge, and the use of modern performance-measurement systems and technologies. Citing examples at BP, North Carolina''s Duke Power and WL Gore, the authors claim that only companies developing their advantage upon the agility and flexibility of their processes, people and technologies can build lasting value for their company, customers and employees. Jeffrey A Oxman is a founder and principal with MPact Consulting, a management consultancy focused on business performance improvement, with offices in New York, Chicago and Dublin. Brian D Smith is a senior adviser with TPI Inc, a sourcing- advisory-services firm, with offices in the United States, Europe and Australia.

Related