Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. IMD-3-1282
Published by: International Institute for Management Development (IMD)
Originally published in: 2003
Version: 14.04.2005
Length: 7 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

In 2002, the Norwegian energy giant Norsk Hydro (Hydro) faced a looming investor relations crisis: Bloc 34, the potential site for a big oil find in Angola, was found to be dry. Hydro had made a serious investment in Bloc 34, and now needed to recover in the eyes of the investment community. Somehow, top management would have to convincingly explain the company's failure to discover oil to the financial markets. If they could not explain it, and maintain the financial community's confidence, Hydro's stock could plummet. Norsk Hydro needed to respond competently and fast, and senior management understood that this problem was too critical to leave to conventional approaches. Hydro, however, was rich in heritage, unwieldy, and traditional, with a strong engineering culture and a decidedly Nordic consensus-driven approach to decisions. Creating the sort of team that could deliver competently and fast would require an entirely new way of doing business. This case describes the team that Hydro created and the way in which they worked.
Location:
Size:
2002 revenues NOK163 billion (USD20 billion)
Other setting(s):
2002

About

Abstract

In 2002, the Norwegian energy giant Norsk Hydro (Hydro) faced a looming investor relations crisis: Bloc 34, the potential site for a big oil find in Angola, was found to be dry. Hydro had made a serious investment in Bloc 34, and now needed to recover in the eyes of the investment community. Somehow, top management would have to convincingly explain the company's failure to discover oil to the financial markets. If they could not explain it, and maintain the financial community's confidence, Hydro's stock could plummet. Norsk Hydro needed to respond competently and fast, and senior management understood that this problem was too critical to leave to conventional approaches. Hydro, however, was rich in heritage, unwieldy, and traditional, with a strong engineering culture and a decidedly Nordic consensus-driven approach to decisions. Creating the sort of team that could deliver competently and fast would require an entirely new way of doing business. This case describes the team that Hydro created and the way in which they worked.

Settings

Location:
Size:
2002 revenues NOK163 billion (USD20 billion)
Other setting(s):
2002

Related