Subject category:
Economics, Politics and Business Environment
Published by:
Asia Case Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong
Length: 9 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/63369
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
In 2000, the Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS) was implemented. Government schools that joined the scheme would be given the freedom to design their own curricula as well as decide on the student application and admission processes. According to the DSS, schools would charge fees payable by the parents, and also enjoy the government subsidy. DSS schools were, therefore, more affordable than private and international schools, and also provided better services than the government schools. This case examines the long-run implications of this scheme and the debate between parents, teachers and schools.
Location:
Other setting(s):
2005
About
Abstract
In 2000, the Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS) was implemented. Government schools that joined the scheme would be given the freedom to design their own curricula as well as decide on the student application and admission processes. According to the DSS, schools would charge fees payable by the parents, and also enjoy the government subsidy. DSS schools were, therefore, more affordable than private and international schools, and also provided better services than the government schools. This case examines the long-run implications of this scheme and the debate between parents, teachers and schools.
Settings
Location:
Other setting(s):
2005