Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Asia Case Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong
Published in: 2005
Length: 9 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

In 2000, the Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS) was implemented. Government schools that joined the scheme would be given the freedom to design their own curricula as well as decide on the student application and admission processes. According to the DSS, schools would charge fees payable by the parents, and also enjoy the government subsidy. DSS schools were, therefore, more affordable than private and international schools, and also provided better services than the government schools. This case examines the long-run implications of this scheme and the debate between parents, teachers and schools.
Location:
Other setting(s):
2005

About

Abstract

In 2000, the Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS) was implemented. Government schools that joined the scheme would be given the freedom to design their own curricula as well as decide on the student application and admission processes. According to the DSS, schools would charge fees payable by the parents, and also enjoy the government subsidy. DSS schools were, therefore, more affordable than private and international schools, and also provided better services than the government schools. This case examines the long-run implications of this scheme and the debate between parents, teachers and schools.

Settings

Location:
Other setting(s):
2005

Related