Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. SMR44110
Published by: MIT Sloan School of Management
Published in: "MIT Sloan Management Review", 2002
Length: 3 pages

Abstract

Venture capital has dried up. Business pages report on getting back to basics. It has even become fashionable to snicker about the foolish mass hallucination of the New Economy. Anyone with a new idea in a corporation is being told ''cost cutting is our focus right now.'' Corporate management has battened down the hatches. Meanwhile, a few contrarian voices say that it''s a great time to start companies because talent is available, entrepreneurs'' valuation expectations have plummeted, and office space is cheap. And for existing companies, they say, it is not time to downsize but time to use freed-up talent to innovate in preparation for the next economic cycle. So which is the right corporate survival strategy - contraction or exploration?

About

Abstract

Venture capital has dried up. Business pages report on getting back to basics. It has even become fashionable to snicker about the foolish mass hallucination of the New Economy. Anyone with a new idea in a corporation is being told ''cost cutting is our focus right now.'' Corporate management has battened down the hatches. Meanwhile, a few contrarian voices say that it''s a great time to start companies because talent is available, entrepreneurs'' valuation expectations have plummeted, and office space is cheap. And for existing companies, they say, it is not time to downsize but time to use freed-up talent to innovate in preparation for the next economic cycle. So which is the right corporate survival strategy - contraction or exploration?

Related