Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Management article
-
Reference no. SMR3727
Authors: Stephen J. Hoch
Published by: MIT Sloan School of Management
Published in: "MIT Sloan Management Review", 1996
Length: 16 pages

Abstract

Traditionally, private labels have been seen as inferior quality alternatives at value prices. Now most national brand manufacturers usually think of private labels as they would any other national brand - a tough source of competition. But private labels are not simply a generic competitor, because the retailer that sells them is also the national brand''s customer. The author considers alternative strategies for national brands to respond to private label encroachment, including doing nothing, distancing themselves through quality innovations, fighting back by reducing price gaps, and establishing several ''me-too'' strategies. He presents empirical evidence to show the viability of each strategy.

About

Abstract

Traditionally, private labels have been seen as inferior quality alternatives at value prices. Now most national brand manufacturers usually think of private labels as they would any other national brand - a tough source of competition. But private labels are not simply a generic competitor, because the retailer that sells them is also the national brand''s customer. The author considers alternative strategies for national brands to respond to private label encroachment, including doing nothing, distancing themselves through quality innovations, fighting back by reducing price gaps, and establishing several ''me-too'' strategies. He presents empirical evidence to show the viability of each strategy.

Related