Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

When the former military dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet, arrives in London for medical treatment in September 1998, there is no hint, in advance, that a major precedent in international law is about to be set. That, however, is what takes shape when the British government unexpectedly decides to honor an extradition request from a judge in Spain seeking to try Pinochet in that country for violations of international human rights treaty provisions. This case provides a step- by-step account of this historic case, raising questions as to the future limits of national sovereignty in a new era in which globalization involves not only commerce but law. Should the fact that Chile itself had appeared to come to a political modus vivendi regarding the Pinochet years have given Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon pause when he set out to prosecute the former strongman? In what sort of political and moral calculus did British Home Secretary Jack Straw -- the key decision-maker in the case -- engage, what sort of obligations did he have, and to whom? Broadly, the case, as applied beyond Pinochet himself, raises questions as to whether international norms should be applied to intra-country political situations and, if so, who should enforce them?

About

Abstract

When the former military dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet, arrives in London for medical treatment in September 1998, there is no hint, in advance, that a major precedent in international law is about to be set. That, however, is what takes shape when the British government unexpectedly decides to honor an extradition request from a judge in Spain seeking to try Pinochet in that country for violations of international human rights treaty provisions. This case provides a step- by-step account of this historic case, raising questions as to the future limits of national sovereignty in a new era in which globalization involves not only commerce but law. Should the fact that Chile itself had appeared to come to a political modus vivendi regarding the Pinochet years have given Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon pause when he set out to prosecute the former strongman? In what sort of political and moral calculus did British Home Secretary Jack Straw -- the key decision-maker in the case -- engage, what sort of obligations did he have, and to whom? Broadly, the case, as applied beyond Pinochet himself, raises questions as to whether international norms should be applied to intra-country political situations and, if so, who should enforce them?

Related