Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

On August 19, 1999, lawyers representing Boston''s Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) and attorneys for The White Fund of Lawrence, Massachusetts were in Suffolk Superior Court to plead their case in a legal battle that had begun earlier that year. At issue was the fate of $8 million worth of fine paintings bequeathed to The White Fund Trust by Reverend William E. Wolcott in his last will and testament. Although The White Fund owned and ostensibly controlled the collection, the paintings had been in the custody of the MFA for over 80 years. At the heart of the legal struggle was essentially the question of how best to interpret and serve the wishes of a benefactor, and in this case, to determine who should benefit: the people of Lawrence or the greater public via the MFA. In the end, the judge would decide which side''s argument had greater merit.

About

Abstract

On August 19, 1999, lawyers representing Boston''s Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) and attorneys for The White Fund of Lawrence, Massachusetts were in Suffolk Superior Court to plead their case in a legal battle that had begun earlier that year. At issue was the fate of $8 million worth of fine paintings bequeathed to The White Fund Trust by Reverend William E. Wolcott in his last will and testament. Although The White Fund owned and ostensibly controlled the collection, the paintings had been in the custody of the MFA for over 80 years. At the heart of the legal struggle was essentially the question of how best to interpret and serve the wishes of a benefactor, and in this case, to determine who should benefit: the people of Lawrence or the greater public via the MFA. In the end, the judge would decide which side''s argument had greater merit.

Related