Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

In 1992, after almost five years of effort, New Jersey -- the nation''s most densely populated state -- adopted a new plan designed to guide local land-use decisions and state spending and regulatory policies in areas such as transportation, environmental protection, and economic development. The plan''s recommendations, however, were not binding on state or local officials. This case examines how two governors -- Democrat James Florio and his successor, Republican Christine Todd Whitman -- have confronted the question of plan implementation. It ends with Whitman being forced to confront several controversial policy disputes just as she was preparing for her 1997 reelection campaign.

About

Abstract

In 1992, after almost five years of effort, New Jersey -- the nation''s most densely populated state -- adopted a new plan designed to guide local land-use decisions and state spending and regulatory policies in areas such as transportation, environmental protection, and economic development. The plan''s recommendations, however, were not binding on state or local officials. This case examines how two governors -- Democrat James Florio and his successor, Republican Christine Todd Whitman -- have confronted the question of plan implementation. It ends with Whitman being forced to confront several controversial policy disputes just as she was preparing for her 1997 reelection campaign.

Related