Subject category:
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Published by:
Harvard Kennedy School
Length: 29 pages
Topics:
Ethics; Law enforcement
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/7107
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
The infamous Cabrini-Green public housing project, dominated by large violent criminal gangs, is the setting for this case describing the unusual tactics of a group of Chicago police. The "Slick Boys", a group of veteran officersuse rap music-which they perform themselves-as a way to gain the trust of the predominantly youthful African-American project population. The officers seek to offer counsel and guidance and to provide recreational activities, as an extension of their law enforcement role. At the same time, they are willing to negotiate, as necessary, with gang leaders, in order to establish and enforce a truce in gang warfare- which limits to danger to the project population but risks providing a de facto assurance to gangs that they can operate within certain limits. This ethics case raises the question of whether it is either wise or defensible for law enforcement officials to negotiate with powerful criminal organizations-in the hope that, in the long term, other efforts serve to change orundermine the criminal culture.
About
Abstract
The infamous Cabrini-Green public housing project, dominated by large violent criminal gangs, is the setting for this case describing the unusual tactics of a group of Chicago police. The "Slick Boys", a group of veteran officersuse rap music-which they perform themselves-as a way to gain the trust of the predominantly youthful African-American project population. The officers seek to offer counsel and guidance and to provide recreational activities, as an extension of their law enforcement role. At the same time, they are willing to negotiate, as necessary, with gang leaders, in order to establish and enforce a truce in gang warfare- which limits to danger to the project population but risks providing a de facto assurance to gangs that they can operate within certain limits. This ethics case raises the question of whether it is either wise or defensible for law enforcement officials to negotiate with powerful criminal organizations-in the hope that, in the long term, other efforts serve to change orundermine the criminal culture.