Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

The infamous Cabrini-Green public housing project, dominated by large violent criminal gangs, is the setting for this case describing the unusual tactics of a group of Chicago police. The "Slick Boys", a group of veteran officersuse rap music-which they perform themselves-as a way to gain the trust of the predominantly youthful African-American project population. The officers seek to offer counsel and guidance and to provide recreational activities, as an extension of their law enforcement role. At the same time, they are willing to negotiate, as necessary, with gang leaders, in order to establish and enforce a truce in gang warfare- which limits to danger to the project population but risks providing a de facto assurance to gangs that they can operate within certain limits. This ethics case raises the question of whether it is either wise or defensible for law enforcement officials to negotiate with powerful criminal organizations-in the hope that, in the long term, other efforts serve to change orundermine the criminal culture.

About

Abstract

The infamous Cabrini-Green public housing project, dominated by large violent criminal gangs, is the setting for this case describing the unusual tactics of a group of Chicago police. The "Slick Boys", a group of veteran officersuse rap music-which they perform themselves-as a way to gain the trust of the predominantly youthful African-American project population. The officers seek to offer counsel and guidance and to provide recreational activities, as an extension of their law enforcement role. At the same time, they are willing to negotiate, as necessary, with gang leaders, in order to establish and enforce a truce in gang warfare- which limits to danger to the project population but risks providing a de facto assurance to gangs that they can operate within certain limits. This ethics case raises the question of whether it is either wise or defensible for law enforcement officials to negotiate with powerful criminal organizations-in the hope that, in the long term, other efforts serve to change orundermine the criminal culture.

Related