Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This pair of cases combines description (Part 1) of the political management of a festering issue at the sprawling U.S. Department of Agriculture, with description (Part 2) of specific steps designed to promote and institutionalizeorganizational change. The focus of the case is the challenge confronted by Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman, former 10-term member of Congress from Kansas, when the Department is challenged by two African-Americangroups who convincingly assert that they have been victims of historic injustice perpetrated by USDA. Black farmers from the Deep South describe-and are treated sympathetically in the press-the denial of loads and other forms of assistance by white-dominated USDA county boards. Black USDA employees claim, too, a history of discrimination-in promotion and other decisions. Glickman, faced with these specific and well-publicized accusations, decides not merely to investigate the charges themselves but to initiate a far-reaching "civil rights action team" across the department, with its more than 100,000 employees. The case allows for both discussion of Glickman''s political management and for critique of the change prescriptions offered by both the civil rights action team and the civil rights implementation team.

About

Abstract

This pair of cases combines description (Part 1) of the political management of a festering issue at the sprawling U.S. Department of Agriculture, with description (Part 2) of specific steps designed to promote and institutionalizeorganizational change. The focus of the case is the challenge confronted by Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman, former 10-term member of Congress from Kansas, when the Department is challenged by two African-Americangroups who convincingly assert that they have been victims of historic injustice perpetrated by USDA. Black farmers from the Deep South describe-and are treated sympathetically in the press-the denial of loads and other forms of assistance by white-dominated USDA county boards. Black USDA employees claim, too, a history of discrimination-in promotion and other decisions. Glickman, faced with these specific and well-publicized accusations, decides not merely to investigate the charges themselves but to initiate a far-reaching "civil rights action team" across the department, with its more than 100,000 employees. The case allows for both discussion of Glickman''s political management and for critique of the change prescriptions offered by both the civil rights action team and the civil rights implementation team.

Related