Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: International Institute for Management Development (IMD)
Originally published in: 2000
Version: 11.12.2006
Length: 6 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

By November 2000, nearly all of the 10 water and sewage companies in England and Wales were considering options for separating the running from the owning of their infrastructures. Even though Kelda, owner of Yorkshire Water, had failed to receive permission to sell its water assets to a customer-owned mutual company, the Welsh group Glas Cymru continued its plans to turn Welsh Water into a not-for-profit company, guaranteed and owned by 200 members of the 'great and the good' in Wales. Selling assets to companies entirely funded by debt promised lower costs of capital in meeting the stringent investment targets and tough price limits set by the previous regulator Sir Ian Byatt. But there was also concern for how this would affect the efficiency of operations and the viability and legitimacy of regulatory control. It was up to the new regulator, Philip Fletcher, to decide whether to authorise the new capital structures and thereby trigger the most drastic reorganisation of the water industry since its privatisation in 1989.
Location:
Industry:

About

Abstract

By November 2000, nearly all of the 10 water and sewage companies in England and Wales were considering options for separating the running from the owning of their infrastructures. Even though Kelda, owner of Yorkshire Water, had failed to receive permission to sell its water assets to a customer-owned mutual company, the Welsh group Glas Cymru continued its plans to turn Welsh Water into a not-for-profit company, guaranteed and owned by 200 members of the 'great and the good' in Wales. Selling assets to companies entirely funded by debt promised lower costs of capital in meeting the stringent investment targets and tough price limits set by the previous regulator Sir Ian Byatt. But there was also concern for how this would affect the efficiency of operations and the viability and legitimacy of regulatory control. It was up to the new regulator, Philip Fletcher, to decide whether to authorise the new capital structures and thereby trigger the most drastic reorganisation of the water industry since its privatisation in 1989.

Settings

Location:
Industry:

Related