Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Published in: 1993
Length: 6 pages

Abstract

In an effort to decentralize decision-making, the US Coast Guard undertakes a program to allow its field units to try new ways of doing things without going through the many layers of bureaucratic approvals which new ideas had traditionally required. Only a veto from the Coast Guard chief of staff, the number three official in the organization, could stop a new approach for which a field commander sought approval. The case details the subsequent problems which plagued the so-called Model Unit program, until the point that it was discontinued. It allows for discussion of factors beyond obvious changes in organization charts which facilitate or impede the adoption of new procedures. The stages of the case track the program through its life, allowing for both prospective and retrospective discussion of the idea.

About

Abstract

In an effort to decentralize decision-making, the US Coast Guard undertakes a program to allow its field units to try new ways of doing things without going through the many layers of bureaucratic approvals which new ideas had traditionally required. Only a veto from the Coast Guard chief of staff, the number three official in the organization, could stop a new approach for which a field commander sought approval. The case details the subsequent problems which plagued the so-called Model Unit program, until the point that it was discontinued. It allows for discussion of factors beyond obvious changes in organization charts which facilitate or impede the adoption of new procedures. The stages of the case track the program through its life, allowing for both prospective and retrospective discussion of the idea.

Related