Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This set of cases examines the origins and implementation of the federal Environmental Protection Agency''s Data Management Program, designed to use information about the sources and nature of pollution in ways the agency hoped would help provide a more complete picture of contamination, and thereby help prevent and reduce environmental hazards. From its origin in Georgia, the case series examines the route by which this enhanced data management concept as taken up by EPA headquarters in Washington and ultimately in a variety of states with varying enforcement mechanisms and relationships to the federal EPA. These include Maine, where technical and resource difficulties hamper implementation; New Hampshire, where the new program seems sharply circumscribed; Missouri, where the state''s emphasis on long-range planning leads to tension with the EPA; and New Jersey, which had not traditionally looked to the federal agency for guidance or help.

About

Abstract

This set of cases examines the origins and implementation of the federal Environmental Protection Agency''s Data Management Program, designed to use information about the sources and nature of pollution in ways the agency hoped would help provide a more complete picture of contamination, and thereby help prevent and reduce environmental hazards. From its origin in Georgia, the case series examines the route by which this enhanced data management concept as taken up by EPA headquarters in Washington and ultimately in a variety of states with varying enforcement mechanisms and relationships to the federal EPA. These include Maine, where technical and resource difficulties hamper implementation; New Hampshire, where the new program seems sharply circumscribed; Missouri, where the state''s emphasis on long-range planning leads to tension with the EPA; and New Jersey, which had not traditionally looked to the federal agency for guidance or help.

Related