Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 307-190-1
Published by: Aalto University School of Economics (formerly HSE)
Published in: 2007

Abstract

Matheson is facing a problem with its structure. It is an exploration and development company active in gold and oil and gas. During this time the market for natural resources commodities was heating up as prices rose, reflecting a decline in production and a weakening US dollar. Demand for their output is putting a strain on management, who are beginning to feel they can no longer finance both types of different businesses under one company effectively. They are now considering a split into two separate public entities to manage and finance each resource independently. In the Canadian market they are also presented with the added incentive to use a unique ''flow-through share'' financing method that seems to make the split attractive. The company must consider how it would organise its human resources and redistribute assets. Government and shareholder approval would be required, and even then it may be a difficult undertaking. Would they be wise to split from a strategic or financial point of view?
Location:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
2005

About

Abstract

Matheson is facing a problem with its structure. It is an exploration and development company active in gold and oil and gas. During this time the market for natural resources commodities was heating up as prices rose, reflecting a decline in production and a weakening US dollar. Demand for their output is putting a strain on management, who are beginning to feel they can no longer finance both types of different businesses under one company effectively. They are now considering a split into two separate public entities to manage and finance each resource independently. In the Canadian market they are also presented with the added incentive to use a unique ''flow-through share'' financing method that seems to make the split attractive. The company must consider how it would organise its human resources and redistribute assets. Government and shareholder approval would be required, and even then it may be a difficult undertaking. Would they be wise to split from a strategic or financial point of view?

Settings

Location:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
2005

Related