Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Originally published in: 1976
Version: 1979
Length: 45 pages

Abstract

This case traces the development, over 16 years, of a major public works project for New York City. The 13.7 mile-long third city water tunnel, designed to distribute 1.7 billion gallons of water per day, was, when ground was broken for it in 1970, the largest public works project to date in the city''s history. The case examines the long planning process for the tunnel construction as it moved through the city''s many layers of line agencies with roles to play, among them the Board of Water Supply, Department of Water Supply, Environmental Protection Administration, City Planning Commission. Ultimately, the case examines the interplay between these agencies, staffed by career personnel, many with technical expertise, and the city''s executive branch, with its political and fiduciary roles. Conflict between the Budget Bureau in the Office of the Mayor-which became an active opponent of the tunnel project- and those agencies which planned the project, frames a discussion about the interplay between career and elected officials, technical experts and politically responsive officials.

About

Abstract

This case traces the development, over 16 years, of a major public works project for New York City. The 13.7 mile-long third city water tunnel, designed to distribute 1.7 billion gallons of water per day, was, when ground was broken for it in 1970, the largest public works project to date in the city''s history. The case examines the long planning process for the tunnel construction as it moved through the city''s many layers of line agencies with roles to play, among them the Board of Water Supply, Department of Water Supply, Environmental Protection Administration, City Planning Commission. Ultimately, the case examines the interplay between these agencies, staffed by career personnel, many with technical expertise, and the city''s executive branch, with its political and fiduciary roles. Conflict between the Budget Bureau in the Office of the Mayor-which became an active opponent of the tunnel project- and those agencies which planned the project, frames a discussion about the interplay between career and elected officials, technical experts and politically responsive officials.

Related