Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Sequel
-
Reference no. HKS1065.1
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Published in: 1991
Length: 4 pages

Abstract

A growing number of cities now utilize Citizen Advisory Committees (CACs) to review plans for large buildings and even smaller structures in historically sensitive areas. Boston, a city of strong neighborhoods, has been exceptionally active in the use of CACs. Indeed, by the mid-1980s Boston had gained something of a reputation as being a difficult place to build because of requirements to work with review committees and with the city''s redevelopment agency, in effect, as new partners in the design process. In the evolution of the role of CACs in design review, a proposal by The New England Life Insurance Company to build new headquarters at Five Hundred Boylston Street in Boston was particularly pivotal. The company proposed a structure far in excess of allowed density, raising concerns about traffic and other neighborhood impacts. In addition, the design of the building provoked widespread criticism, particularly from residents of the prestigious Back Bay neighborhood.

About

Abstract

A growing number of cities now utilize Citizen Advisory Committees (CACs) to review plans for large buildings and even smaller structures in historically sensitive areas. Boston, a city of strong neighborhoods, has been exceptionally active in the use of CACs. Indeed, by the mid-1980s Boston had gained something of a reputation as being a difficult place to build because of requirements to work with review committees and with the city''s redevelopment agency, in effect, as new partners in the design process. In the evolution of the role of CACs in design review, a proposal by The New England Life Insurance Company to build new headquarters at Five Hundred Boylston Street in Boston was particularly pivotal. The company proposed a structure far in excess of allowed density, raising concerns about traffic and other neighborhood impacts. In addition, the design of the building provoked widespread criticism, particularly from residents of the prestigious Back Bay neighborhood.

Related