Subject category:
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Published by:
Harvard Kennedy School
Length: 2 pages
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/7584
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
This case examines the decision facing the Federal Power Commission (FPC) of whether to license hydroelectric development of Idaho's Snake River. After providing background on the area's wilderness value and on the FPC, it describes a series of administrative and judicial proceedings stretching from the mid-1950s through 1971. The student is then presented with a set of quantitative questions designed to show the economic and environmental costs and benefits of the project as well as the relevance of cost-benefit analysis to the decision. The sequel describes the final FPC decision to grant the license and the countervailing congressional action, which resulted in the Snake River being declared a National Recreation Area.
About
Abstract
This case examines the decision facing the Federal Power Commission (FPC) of whether to license hydroelectric development of Idaho's Snake River. After providing background on the area's wilderness value and on the FPC, it describes a series of administrative and judicial proceedings stretching from the mid-1950s through 1971. The student is then presented with a set of quantitative questions designed to show the economic and environmental costs and benefits of the project as well as the relevance of cost-benefit analysis to the decision. The sequel describes the final FPC decision to grant the license and the countervailing congressional action, which resulted in the Snake River being declared a National Recreation Area.