Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Sequel
-
Reference no. HKS0049.1
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Published in: 1976
Length: 2 pages

Abstract

This case examines the decision facing the Federal Power Commission (FPC) of whether to license hydroelectric development of Idaho's Snake River. After providing background on the area's wilderness value and on the FPC, it describes a series of administrative and judicial proceedings stretching from the mid-1950s through 1971. The student is then presented with a set of quantitative questions designed to show the economic and environmental costs and benefits of the project as well as the relevance of cost-benefit analysis to the decision. The sequel describes the final FPC decision to grant the license and the countervailing congressional action, which resulted in the Snake River being declared a National Recreation Area.

About

Abstract

This case examines the decision facing the Federal Power Commission (FPC) of whether to license hydroelectric development of Idaho's Snake River. After providing background on the area's wilderness value and on the FPC, it describes a series of administrative and judicial proceedings stretching from the mid-1950s through 1971. The student is then presented with a set of quantitative questions designed to show the economic and environmental costs and benefits of the project as well as the relevance of cost-benefit analysis to the decision. The sequel describes the final FPC decision to grant the license and the countervailing congressional action, which resulted in the Snake River being declared a National Recreation Area.

Related