Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Compact case
Published by: Harvard Kennedy School
Published in: 1988
Length: 1 pages

Abstract

In July 1983, EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus issued proposed regulations to control arsenic emissions from copper smelting and glass manufacturing plants. At the same time, he announced that EPA would involve residents of the Tacoma, Washington area - home of a copper smelting plant owned by the American Smelting and Refining Company (Asarco) - in the decision as to whether to make the standards more stringent. EPA believed the regulations it was proposing would still leave the risk of one additional cancer death per year among area residents, but imposing further controls could lead to the closing of the plant and the loss of over 500 jobs. In drawing local citizens into the decision-making process, Ruckelshaus was providing a forum in which to test his ideas on managing risk. This case describes the public workshops and hearings that EPA held to involve residents in the final decision-making.

About

Abstract

In July 1983, EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus issued proposed regulations to control arsenic emissions from copper smelting and glass manufacturing plants. At the same time, he announced that EPA would involve residents of the Tacoma, Washington area - home of a copper smelting plant owned by the American Smelting and Refining Company (Asarco) - in the decision as to whether to make the standards more stringent. EPA believed the regulations it was proposing would still leave the risk of one additional cancer death per year among area residents, but imposing further controls could lead to the closing of the plant and the loss of over 500 jobs. In drawing local citizens into the decision-making process, Ruckelshaus was providing a forum in which to test his ideas on managing risk. This case describes the public workshops and hearings that EPA held to involve residents in the final decision-making.

Related