The independent home of the case method - and a charity. Make an impact and  donate

Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case from journal
-
Reference no. NAC2006
Published by: NACRA - North American Case Research Association
Published in: "The Case Research Journal", 2000
Length: 13 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

A female employee in a state mental hospital used sex and current sexual harassment and discriminative regulations to continually harass superiors and co-workers to get her way within the institution. Her threats of discrimination and sexual harassment served as employment insurance and counterbalanced charges of sexual misconduct with her supervisors and co-workers and of her abusive behaviors toward patients. Although these behaviors were well known, because she had a strong loyal male following within the hospital, administrators did not believe they could marshal sufficient documentation to call for her resignation without attracting damaging publicity and becoming involved in expensive litigation. The incidents described occurred at a time when the hospital itself was a political football in the state legislature. The case illustrates the difficulties of dismissing employees for just cause when unethical employees resort to blackmail in highly political situations that extend far beyond organizational boundaries.

About

Abstract

A female employee in a state mental hospital used sex and current sexual harassment and discriminative regulations to continually harass superiors and co-workers to get her way within the institution. Her threats of discrimination and sexual harassment served as employment insurance and counterbalanced charges of sexual misconduct with her supervisors and co-workers and of her abusive behaviors toward patients. Although these behaviors were well known, because she had a strong loyal male following within the hospital, administrators did not believe they could marshal sufficient documentation to call for her resignation without attracting damaging publicity and becoming involved in expensive litigation. The incidents described occurred at a time when the hospital itself was a political football in the state legislature. The case illustrates the difficulties of dismissing employees for just cause when unethical employees resort to blackmail in highly political situations that extend far beyond organizational boundaries.

Related