Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case from journal
-
Reference no. NAC1923
Published by: NACRA - North American Case Research Association
Published in: "The Case Research Journal", 1999
Length: 10 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Calvin Klein Inc is a company with a history of controversial advertising, going back to 1980''s ads with then 15-year-old actress Brooke Shields saying, ''Nothing comes between me and my Calvins''. In 1995, the company began a new series of ads for Calvin Klein jeanswear, featuring young models in suggestive poses. The (A) case describes the company and the controversy generated by the new ad campaign. The ads began in early July and ran in several magazines, including one read by girls as young as 12. Other publishers felt that the ads approached pornography. Dayton Hudson department stores refused to lift their stores in the ads. The American Family Association, a conservative Christian Group, threatened boycotts of retailers who carried the jeans. News programs identified one of the models as 15 years old. By late August, the company faced growing pressure to do something about its ads - but what? In the (B) case the controversy escalated, as the FBI announced an investigation into whether the ads were child pornography, and others became concerned about possible censorship.

About

Abstract

Calvin Klein Inc is a company with a history of controversial advertising, going back to 1980''s ads with then 15-year-old actress Brooke Shields saying, ''Nothing comes between me and my Calvins''. In 1995, the company began a new series of ads for Calvin Klein jeanswear, featuring young models in suggestive poses. The (A) case describes the company and the controversy generated by the new ad campaign. The ads began in early July and ran in several magazines, including one read by girls as young as 12. Other publishers felt that the ads approached pornography. Dayton Hudson department stores refused to lift their stores in the ads. The American Family Association, a conservative Christian Group, threatened boycotts of retailers who carried the jeans. News programs identified one of the models as 15 years old. By late August, the company faced growing pressure to do something about its ads - but what? In the (B) case the controversy escalated, as the FBI announced an investigation into whether the ads were child pornography, and others became concerned about possible censorship.

Related