Subject category:
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Published by:
INSEAD
Version: 06.2004
Length: 6 pages
Data source: Published sources
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/7990
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
This is the second of a two-case series (704-043-1 and 704-044-1). Fresh from his victory for increased shareholder rights, corporate raider Wyser-Pratte, together with a coalition of active investors, tries in this (B) case to use their new found rights to influence the strategic direction of the Vendex company. In contrast to Wyser-Pratte''s comments in the previous year, one investor - K Capital Partners - pressures management and the supervisory board to consider selling the company, in the belief that the conglomorate is undervalued and that an acquirer would easily pay a 100% to 200% premium over the current share price, thereby maximising shareholder value. The purpose of this case is to allow a discussion on who is really in the best position to make strategic decisions within a company, management or shareholders? Students can discuss if they believe that active investors act in the interests of all shareholders (or stakeholders) or that they are simply looking for whatever short-term gains they can get? Does an increase in share price reflect the long term value creation potential of the company or merely give investors the opportunity to divest?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
45,000 employees, net sales EUR4.5 billion in 2002
Other setting(s):
2002-2003
About
Abstract
This is the second of a two-case series (704-043-1 and 704-044-1). Fresh from his victory for increased shareholder rights, corporate raider Wyser-Pratte, together with a coalition of active investors, tries in this (B) case to use their new found rights to influence the strategic direction of the Vendex company. In contrast to Wyser-Pratte''s comments in the previous year, one investor - K Capital Partners - pressures management and the supervisory board to consider selling the company, in the belief that the conglomorate is undervalued and that an acquirer would easily pay a 100% to 200% premium over the current share price, thereby maximising shareholder value. The purpose of this case is to allow a discussion on who is really in the best position to make strategic decisions within a company, management or shareholders? Students can discuss if they believe that active investors act in the interests of all shareholders (or stakeholders) or that they are simply looking for whatever short-term gains they can get? Does an increase in share price reflect the long term value creation potential of the company or merely give investors the opportunity to divest?
Settings
Location:
Industry:
Size:
45,000 employees, net sales EUR4.5 billion in 2002
Other setting(s):
2002-2003