Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 704-044-1
Published by: INSEAD
Originally published in: 2004
Version: 06.2004

Abstract

This is the second of a two-case series (704-043-1 and 704-044-1). Fresh from his victory for increased shareholder rights, corporate raider Wyser-Pratte, together with a coalition of active investors, tries in this (B) case to use their new found rights to influence the strategic direction of the Vendex company. In contrast to Wyser-Pratte''s comments in the previous year, one investor - K Capital Partners - pressures management and the supervisory board to consider selling the company, in the belief that the conglomorate is undervalued and that an acquirer would easily pay a 100% to 200% premium over the current share price, thereby maximising shareholder value. The purpose of this case is to allow a discussion on who is really in the best position to make strategic decisions within a company, management or shareholders? Students can discuss if they believe that active investors act in the interests of all shareholders (or stakeholders) or that they are simply looking for whatever short-term gains they can get? Does an increase in share price reflect the long term value creation potential of the company or merely give investors the opportunity to divest?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
45,000 employees, net sales EUR4.5 billion in 2002
Other setting(s):
2002-2003

About

Abstract

This is the second of a two-case series (704-043-1 and 704-044-1). Fresh from his victory for increased shareholder rights, corporate raider Wyser-Pratte, together with a coalition of active investors, tries in this (B) case to use their new found rights to influence the strategic direction of the Vendex company. In contrast to Wyser-Pratte''s comments in the previous year, one investor - K Capital Partners - pressures management and the supervisory board to consider selling the company, in the belief that the conglomorate is undervalued and that an acquirer would easily pay a 100% to 200% premium over the current share price, thereby maximising shareholder value. The purpose of this case is to allow a discussion on who is really in the best position to make strategic decisions within a company, management or shareholders? Students can discuss if they believe that active investors act in the interests of all shareholders (or stakeholders) or that they are simply looking for whatever short-term gains they can get? Does an increase in share price reflect the long term value creation potential of the company or merely give investors the opportunity to divest?

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
45,000 employees, net sales EUR4.5 billion in 2002
Other setting(s):
2002-2003

Related