Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 103-029-1
Published by: INSEAD
Published in: 2003
Length: 22 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

This case focuses on Citigroup''s attempt to bolster its European presence by acquiring the investment banking business of Schroders PLC in 2000, following a conclusion on the part of key Schroders shareholders that the future of an independent Europe-based investment bank was limited - that it was unlikely that shareholders would be able to achieve a better outcome of the Citigroup offer on a risk-adjusted present value basis if the firm remained independent. A number of questions are addressed in the case: Why was Schroders unable to survive as an independent, Europe-based investment banking firm? Or was it? Why did the previous shareholders choose to sell only the investment banking business to Citigroup, retaining the asset management business? How does the Schroders acquisition fit into Citigroup''s overall strategy? How would you measure ''success'' or ''failure'' in this regard? What about the price? What are the key integration challenges that face Citigroup, to make sure it gets the most out of the Schroders acquisition?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
150,000 employees
Other setting(s):
2001

About

Abstract

This case focuses on Citigroup''s attempt to bolster its European presence by acquiring the investment banking business of Schroders PLC in 2000, following a conclusion on the part of key Schroders shareholders that the future of an independent Europe-based investment bank was limited - that it was unlikely that shareholders would be able to achieve a better outcome of the Citigroup offer on a risk-adjusted present value basis if the firm remained independent. A number of questions are addressed in the case: Why was Schroders unable to survive as an independent, Europe-based investment banking firm? Or was it? Why did the previous shareholders choose to sell only the investment banking business to Citigroup, retaining the asset management business? How does the Schroders acquisition fit into Citigroup''s overall strategy? How would you measure ''success'' or ''failure'' in this regard? What about the price? What are the key integration challenges that face Citigroup, to make sure it gets the most out of the Schroders acquisition?

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
150,000 employees
Other setting(s):
2001

Related