Subject category:
Strategy and General Management
Published by:
INSEAD
Length: 14 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/8354
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
This is part of a case series. Competing head-to-head in a mature, slowly growing market can be cut-throat. The US car retailing industry was very much characterised by the classic symptoms of an unattractive industry. Players very much disliked competing in this difficult environment but did not see how they could break away from the pack. This case will show how some players, such as CarMax, AutoNation and Autobytel, have systematically broken away from the pack and have re-shaped the contours of the US car retailing industry through their creative strategies. Most companies focus on matching and beating their rivals and as a result develop strategies that tend to converge along the same basic dimensions of competition. These companies share an implicit set of beliefs about how to compete. They share a conventional wisdom about who their customers are and what they value and about the scope of products and services their industry should be offering. As the rivals try to outdo one another, they end up competing solely on the basis of incremental improvements in cost, quality or both.
About
Abstract
This is part of a case series. Competing head-to-head in a mature, slowly growing market can be cut-throat. The US car retailing industry was very much characterised by the classic symptoms of an unattractive industry. Players very much disliked competing in this difficult environment but did not see how they could break away from the pack. This case will show how some players, such as CarMax, AutoNation and Autobytel, have systematically broken away from the pack and have re-shaped the contours of the US car retailing industry through their creative strategies. Most companies focus on matching and beating their rivals and as a result develop strategies that tend to converge along the same basic dimensions of competition. These companies share an implicit set of beliefs about how to compete. They share a conventional wisdom about who their customers are and what they value and about the scope of products and services their industry should be offering. As the rivals try to outdo one another, they end up competing solely on the basis of incremental improvements in cost, quality or both.