Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This structured assignment is to accompany the case ''108-057-1''. The abstract of the case is as follows: On 22 May 2007, Sun Pharmaceuticals, India''s largest pharmaceutical company signed a $454 million merger deal with Israeli major, Taro Pharmaceuticals, which included an ''option agreement''. The agreement granted an option by Taro''s Chairman, Barrie Levitt for Sun to acquire all the shares of Taro in case the merger failed. This merger deal priced Taro''s equity at $7.75 per share as against its closing price of $6.10 on 18 May 2007. Since Taro was in a financial crisis at the end of 2006, the merger offer from Sun came as a rescue which could improve its financial position. Sun Pharmaceuticals provided $224 million in net debt to Taro, in addition to interim financing of $45 million. For Sun, this opportunity provided increased capabilities and market reach in the US. Despite the prospects from the merger deal, Taro called off the deal in May 2008 stating that Sun''s offer of $7.75 per share was financially inadequate and no longer in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. During the course of the merger process, Sun faced difficulties with Taro''s decision to postpone and thwart the merger deal. It also faced resistance from the disinterested minority shareholders of Taro. Moreover, on 21 June 2008, Taro filed a case in the Israeli court to prevent Sun from taking over at the revised price of $10.25 per share. A few days later, Sun too, filed a case against Taro in the supreme court of New York for terminating the merger deal. Though the Israeli district court gave a verdict in favour of Sun, it is left to Taro to surrender its stake to Sun or to appeal in the Israeli supreme court for final judgement. The case deals with the allegations and counter-allegations that happened in the Sun-Taro merger deal. The case study helps students to understand and analyse: (1) the challenges in cross-border merger and acquisitions; (2) the key aspects of the Sun-Taro Merger deal; (3) the synergy between Sun and Taro; and (4) the events that led the merger to culminate.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2008

About

Abstract

This structured assignment is to accompany the case ''108-057-1''. The abstract of the case is as follows: On 22 May 2007, Sun Pharmaceuticals, India''s largest pharmaceutical company signed a $454 million merger deal with Israeli major, Taro Pharmaceuticals, which included an ''option agreement''. The agreement granted an option by Taro''s Chairman, Barrie Levitt for Sun to acquire all the shares of Taro in case the merger failed. This merger deal priced Taro''s equity at $7.75 per share as against its closing price of $6.10 on 18 May 2007. Since Taro was in a financial crisis at the end of 2006, the merger offer from Sun came as a rescue which could improve its financial position. Sun Pharmaceuticals provided $224 million in net debt to Taro, in addition to interim financing of $45 million. For Sun, this opportunity provided increased capabilities and market reach in the US. Despite the prospects from the merger deal, Taro called off the deal in May 2008 stating that Sun''s offer of $7.75 per share was financially inadequate and no longer in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. During the course of the merger process, Sun faced difficulties with Taro''s decision to postpone and thwart the merger deal. It also faced resistance from the disinterested minority shareholders of Taro. Moreover, on 21 June 2008, Taro filed a case in the Israeli court to prevent Sun from taking over at the revised price of $10.25 per share. A few days later, Sun too, filed a case against Taro in the supreme court of New York for terminating the merger deal. Though the Israeli district court gave a verdict in favour of Sun, it is left to Taro to surrender its stake to Sun or to appeal in the Israeli supreme court for final judgement. The case deals with the allegations and counter-allegations that happened in the Sun-Taro merger deal. The case study helps students to understand and analyse: (1) the challenges in cross-border merger and acquisitions; (2) the key aspects of the Sun-Taro Merger deal; (3) the synergy between Sun and Taro; and (4) the events that led the merger to culminate.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2008

Related