Subject category:
Strategy and General Management
Published by:
Stanford Business School
Version: 17 November 2004
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/87533
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
In June 2001, the men's wrestling program at Marquette University was terminated, despite the fact that the program had been operating for several years with privately raised funding. Bucknell University discontinued its wrestling program the same year. An important factor in the termination of these programs was Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which required that 'no person... on the basis of sex... be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance'. Title IX was primarily intended to help women overcome discrimination in academic programs, but it also applied to athletics. Marquette and Bucknell sued the US Department of Education to eliminate what they viewed as the unintended consequences of Title IX implementation in reducing opportunities for men. The case describes Title IX, its implementation, and controversial issues faced by institutions attempting to meet the objectives of the law.
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2001
About
Abstract
In June 2001, the men's wrestling program at Marquette University was terminated, despite the fact that the program had been operating for several years with privately raised funding. Bucknell University discontinued its wrestling program the same year. An important factor in the termination of these programs was Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which required that 'no person... on the basis of sex... be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance'. Title IX was primarily intended to help women overcome discrimination in academic programs, but it also applied to athletics. Marquette and Bucknell sued the US Department of Education to eliminate what they viewed as the unintended consequences of Title IX implementation in reducing opportunities for men. The case describes Title IX, its implementation, and controversial issues faced by institutions attempting to meet the objectives of the law.
Settings
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2001