Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. E61B
Subject category: Entrepreneurship
Published by: Stanford Business School
Originally published in: 2003
Version: 2 October 2003
Length: 11 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

This is a follow up case to Cadence vs Avant! (January 1998). The case picks up where the (A) case leaves off, describes the outcomes of the Criminal and Civil court cases, tells the story of the Deputy District Attorney (DA) who prosecuted the case, and offers a ''where are they now'' view of each party (Cadence, Avant!, and the DA).
Industry:
Size:
Thousands of employees, $917 milion annual gross revenues (Cadence)
Other setting(s):
1997-2002

About

Abstract

This is a follow up case to Cadence vs Avant! (January 1998). The case picks up where the (A) case leaves off, describes the outcomes of the Criminal and Civil court cases, tells the story of the Deputy District Attorney (DA) who prosecuted the case, and offers a ''where are they now'' view of each party (Cadence, Avant!, and the DA).

Settings

Industry:
Size:
Thousands of employees, $917 milion annual gross revenues (Cadence)
Other setting(s):
1997-2002

Related