Subject category:
Entrepreneurship
Published by:
Stanford Business School
Version: 2 October 2003
Length: 11 pages
Data source: Field research
Abstract
This is a follow up case to Cadence vs Avant! (January 1998). The case picks up where the (A) case leaves off, describes the outcomes of the Criminal and Civil court cases, tells the story of the Deputy District Attorney (DA) who prosecuted the case, and offers a ''where are they now'' view of each party (Cadence, Avant!, and the DA).
Industry:
Size:
Thousands of employees, $917 milion annual gross revenues (Cadence)
Other setting(s):
1997-2002
About
Abstract
This is a follow up case to Cadence vs Avant! (January 1998). The case picks up where the (A) case leaves off, describes the outcomes of the Criminal and Civil court cases, tells the story of the Deputy District Attorney (DA) who prosecuted the case, and offers a ''where are they now'' view of each party (Cadence, Avant!, and the DA).
Settings
Industry:
Size:
Thousands of employees, $917 milion annual gross revenues (Cadence)
Other setting(s):
1997-2002