Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. OIT34
Published by: Stanford Business School
Originally published in: 2000
Version: 25 March 2004
Length: 18 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

In May 2000, Sonia Syngal, Director of Procurement Strategy and Supplier Relations at Sun Microsystems, needed to make a critical decision. Under Syngal''s leadership, the company had just completed its first ''dynamic bidding'' pilot tests and, as a result, cut its sourcing costs by 30%. Given these results, the potential for cost cutting via the implementation of a dynamic bidding system on a widespread scale at Sun was enormous; on an annual basis, the company was currently spending about $9 billion in direct materials procurement. Although the potential to cut costs significantly was clear, Syngal had several other issues to consider, including: (1) Sun''s suppliers and the potential impact of a dynamic bidding program on the company''s critical relationships; (2) the reaction of Sun''s internal constituents, namely, its commodity directors who had spent years trying to identify the most effective way to work with the company''s suppliers; and (3) selecting the best software vendor, which would be difficult in a crowded space.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
43,683 employees (year end 2001), USD18, 250 million revenues (2001)
Other setting(s):
1998-2000

About

Abstract

In May 2000, Sonia Syngal, Director of Procurement Strategy and Supplier Relations at Sun Microsystems, needed to make a critical decision. Under Syngal''s leadership, the company had just completed its first ''dynamic bidding'' pilot tests and, as a result, cut its sourcing costs by 30%. Given these results, the potential for cost cutting via the implementation of a dynamic bidding system on a widespread scale at Sun was enormous; on an annual basis, the company was currently spending about $9 billion in direct materials procurement. Although the potential to cut costs significantly was clear, Syngal had several other issues to consider, including: (1) Sun''s suppliers and the potential impact of a dynamic bidding program on the company''s critical relationships; (2) the reaction of Sun''s internal constituents, namely, its commodity directors who had spent years trying to identify the most effective way to work with the company''s suppliers; and (3) selecting the best software vendor, which would be difficult in a crowded space.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
43,683 employees (year end 2001), USD18, 250 million revenues (2001)
Other setting(s):
1998-2000

Related