Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. 9-910-045
Authors: James K Sebenius
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 2010
Version: 13 May 2013
Revision date: 31-May-2013
Length: 12 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Sued for patent infringement, chemical manufacturer CK Claridge tries to design a settlement strategy taking into account a decision analysis of litigating v negotiating. The plaintiffs are the patent holder and its sole licensee, who is also a CKC competitor. (This case is a revised, alternative version of CK Coolidge, Inc (Abridged)).
Location:
Size:
Gross revenue
Other setting(s):
2009

About

Abstract

Sued for patent infringement, chemical manufacturer CK Claridge tries to design a settlement strategy taking into account a decision analysis of litigating v negotiating. The plaintiffs are the patent holder and its sole licensee, who is also a CKC competitor. (This case is a revised, alternative version of CK Coolidge, Inc (Abridged)).

Settings

Location:
Size:
Gross revenue
Other setting(s):
2009

Related