Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Indiana University
Published in: "Business Horizons", 2005

Abstract

At what point does legitimate competitive intelligence gathering cross the line into industrial espionage, and what is it about certain intelligence-gathering practices that opens them up to criticism? Examines three recent cases of industrial espionage, involving major multinationals such as Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Canal Plus, and Ericsson. The argument is made that, from an ethical point of view, industrial espionage can be assessed according to three main considerations: the tactics used in the acquisition of information, the privacy of the information concerned, and the consequences for the public interest as a result of the deployment of the information by the intelligence gatherer.

About

Abstract

At what point does legitimate competitive intelligence gathering cross the line into industrial espionage, and what is it about certain intelligence-gathering practices that opens them up to criticism? Examines three recent cases of industrial espionage, involving major multinationals such as Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Canal Plus, and Ericsson. The argument is made that, from an ethical point of view, industrial espionage can be assessed according to three main considerations: the tactics used in the acquisition of information, the privacy of the information concerned, and the consequences for the public interest as a result of the deployment of the information by the intelligence gatherer.

Settings


Related