Product details

The case discusses the ethical procurement practices of the world's largest furniture retailer, Sweden-based IKEA, a specialist in stylish but inexpensive furniture in Scandinavian designs. Initially, the company was accused of large-scale cutting of trees and using chemicals in furniture manufacturing. Thereafter, IKEA started working toward better procurement practices. In 2000, in an attempt to improve its operations and processes and minimize the negative impact of these on society and the environment, IKEA launched a set of environmental and social standards called the 'IWAY'. Under IWAY, a set of directives was specified for IKEA's suppliers; it was mandatory for all the suppliers to abide by IWAY that outlined the requirements for procuring the raw material, maintaining environmental balance, and waste disposal, among other things. IKEA terminated its contract with some of its suppliers due to their non-compliance with the IWAY standards. IKEA's design team considered the price, quality, function, material, and technical aspects of the product, and ensured that the products were free from substances that caused allergies or were harmful to health and to the environment. The designers were encouraged to review the environmental consequences of their designs. IKEA deployed IWAY inspectors to visit the suppliers to ensure that they adhered to the code of conduct specified by it. Despite its stringent IWAY code of conduct, research on IKEA revealed that the company lacked transparency in the IWAY standards and provided very little information on them to the public; also, the monitoring process for checking IWAY compliance among its suppliers was vague. On several occasions, IKEA was also questioned for its forest management practices.