Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. HLT6-27-16-1008C
Subject category: Entrepreneurship
Published by: Hult Publishing
Published in: 2016

Abstract

In the month of June 2015, EngagedX released a report of the impact investing market, aggregating the returns of over 400 deals done in the UK by three large impact-first investors. The return was negative 0.77% per annum. That same month, the Global Impact Investing Network and Cambridge Associates released a different report, summarising the return of 51 finance-first impact investors, with an overall IRR of 6.9%. The two are the first benchmarks of impact investing ever published. Although the two benchmarks are different in focus and methodology, taken together, they make the case that impact investments are investible, both for finance-first investors, who can expect commercial-like rates of return, and for impact-first investors, who can expect capital preservation on a par with alternative loans to unbankable entities. For EngagedX, the sudden appearance of a competing report, issued by a high profile partnership of powerful actors, and with more attractive results, raised some questions as to what further challenges lay ahead.
Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
2015

About

Abstract

In the month of June 2015, EngagedX released a report of the impact investing market, aggregating the returns of over 400 deals done in the UK by three large impact-first investors. The return was negative 0.77% per annum. That same month, the Global Impact Investing Network and Cambridge Associates released a different report, summarising the return of 51 finance-first impact investors, with an overall IRR of 6.9%. The two are the first benchmarks of impact investing ever published. Although the two benchmarks are different in focus and methodology, taken together, they make the case that impact investments are investible, both for finance-first investors, who can expect commercial-like rates of return, and for impact-first investors, who can expect capital preservation on a par with alternative loans to unbankable entities. For EngagedX, the sudden appearance of a competing report, issued by a high profile partnership of powerful actors, and with more attractive results, raised some questions as to what further challenges lay ahead.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Size:
Small
Other setting(s):
2015

Related