Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Case
-
Reference no. CCW190402
Published by: Columbia CaseWorks, Columbia Business School
Originally published in: 2018
Version: August 24, 2022
Revision date: 19-Oct-2022
Length: 28 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

In April 2018, Indra Nooyi, CEO and Chair of the Board of PepsiCo, was asked if the company should keep its snacks and beverages businesses together. PepsiCo was doing well in general. Its 2017 annualized dividend per share had increased by 50 percent, and it returned USD38 billion to shareholders. However, the company's report for the quarter told a familiar story. Revenues for its snacks division, Frito Lay North America, grew by 3 percent, while revenues for its North American Beverages division fell by 1 percent. Were snacks and beverages actually better together, or would a separation allow each business to maximize its potential? Nooyi's response reflected the strong conviction among PepsiCo's leadership that keeping them together created synergies that made the company more valuable than the sum of its parts. Many investors, however, were just as convinced that PepsiCo would be more efficient and profitable as two pure play companies. This case provides background on the company and the snacks and beverage markets while asking students to consider Pepsico's best strategy for future growth.

Teaching and learning

This item is suitable for undergraduate and postgraduate courses.

Geographical setting

Region:
Americas
Country:
United States

Featured companies

PepsiCo
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Food & beverage
Frito-Lay

Featured protagonist

  • Indra Nooyi (female), CEO

About

Abstract

In April 2018, Indra Nooyi, CEO and Chair of the Board of PepsiCo, was asked if the company should keep its snacks and beverages businesses together. PepsiCo was doing well in general. Its 2017 annualized dividend per share had increased by 50 percent, and it returned USD38 billion to shareholders. However, the company's report for the quarter told a familiar story. Revenues for its snacks division, Frito Lay North America, grew by 3 percent, while revenues for its North American Beverages division fell by 1 percent. Were snacks and beverages actually better together, or would a separation allow each business to maximize its potential? Nooyi's response reflected the strong conviction among PepsiCo's leadership that keeping them together created synergies that made the company more valuable than the sum of its parts. Many investors, however, were just as convinced that PepsiCo would be more efficient and profitable as two pure play companies. This case provides background on the company and the snacks and beverage markets while asking students to consider Pepsico's best strategy for future growth.

Teaching and learning

This item is suitable for undergraduate and postgraduate courses.

Settings

Geographical setting

Region:
Americas
Country:
United States

Featured companies

PepsiCo
Type:
Public company
Industry:
Food & beverage
Frito-Lay

Featured protagonist

  • Indra Nooyi (female), CEO

Related