Product details

Product details
By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

Zara, an iconic fast fashion brand owned by Industria de Diseño Textil (Inditex), had experienced strong sales and increased profits during the first half of 2023. But it was facing increasing hostility for the environmental impact of its operations. There had been accusations of greenwashing, which meant a company conveying a false impression about whether its products or operations were environmentally sound. There were concerns that the European Commission might enact regulations to punish retailers like Zara. Fast fashion took advantage of a culture of consumption and disposability. Garments were often assembled in locations with poor labor standards, using cheaper materials that had negative environmental impacts, such as polyester. Moreover, garments purchased from fast fashion brands were often discarded after only a couple of uses, generating significant waste. How much should Zara disclose about its environmental impact? How much should the company highlight initiatives designed to reduce waste, such as its preowned program, or its carbon footprint, such as its use of polyester created from captured carbon emissions? How should it design its sustainability report to effectively communicate the positive impact Zara had on society as a whole?

About

Abstract

Zara, an iconic fast fashion brand owned by Industria de Diseño Textil (Inditex), had experienced strong sales and increased profits during the first half of 2023. But it was facing increasing hostility for the environmental impact of its operations. There had been accusations of greenwashing, which meant a company conveying a false impression about whether its products or operations were environmentally sound. There were concerns that the European Commission might enact regulations to punish retailers like Zara. Fast fashion took advantage of a culture of consumption and disposability. Garments were often assembled in locations with poor labor standards, using cheaper materials that had negative environmental impacts, such as polyester. Moreover, garments purchased from fast fashion brands were often discarded after only a couple of uses, generating significant waste. How much should Zara disclose about its environmental impact? How much should the company highlight initiatives designed to reduce waste, such as its preowned program, or its carbon footprint, such as its use of polyester created from captured carbon emissions? How should it design its sustainability report to effectively communicate the positive impact Zara had on society as a whole?

Settings


Related