Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

As a member of the European Union, France had to follow European Competition Commission (ECC) rules and regulations regarding state aid. However France has been violating those provisions, sometimes openly and sometimes covertly. While the politicians seem to believe in free trade and competition, they resort to protectionist policies when their own industries are involved. These protectionist policies and state aid do not seem to serve the very purpose they are intended for. This case discusses the causes, which led to the bankruptcy of France Telecom, Credit Lyonnais, Bull and Alstom. It also discusses how the French government tried to save these companies and how ECC rules were violated. It briefly discusses whether state aid is useful or not.
Location:
Other setting(s):
2003

About

Abstract

As a member of the European Union, France had to follow European Competition Commission (ECC) rules and regulations regarding state aid. However France has been violating those provisions, sometimes openly and sometimes covertly. While the politicians seem to believe in free trade and competition, they resort to protectionist policies when their own industries are involved. These protectionist policies and state aid do not seem to serve the very purpose they are intended for. This case discusses the causes, which led to the bankruptcy of France Telecom, Credit Lyonnais, Bull and Alstom. It also discusses how the French government tried to save these companies and how ECC rules were violated. It briefly discusses whether state aid is useful or not.

Settings

Location:
Other setting(s):
2003

Related