Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Published by: Asia Case Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong
Published in: 2006
Length: 15 pages
Data source: Published sources

Abstract

In 2002, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange released a consultation paper with proposals for continued listing eligibility for ''penny'' stocks. A panic sell-off ensued as investors believed that they were about to lose both the marketplace for their shares and also the protection of the listing rules. In one trading day, roughly 10% of the market capitalisation for microcaps was wiped out. What went wrong? Was this related to the Exchange''s status as a for-profit entity following its demutualisation? To shed investor scepticism about the quality of listed companies and to ensure its competitiveness with other financial centres, Hong Kong sorely needs better rules to promote market transparency and better corporate governance.
Location:
Other setting(s):
2002

About

Abstract

In 2002, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange released a consultation paper with proposals for continued listing eligibility for ''penny'' stocks. A panic sell-off ensued as investors believed that they were about to lose both the marketplace for their shares and also the protection of the listing rules. In one trading day, roughly 10% of the market capitalisation for microcaps was wiped out. What went wrong? Was this related to the Exchange''s status as a for-profit entity following its demutualisation? To shed investor scepticism about the quality of listed companies and to ensure its competitiveness with other financial centres, Hong Kong sorely needs better rules to promote market transparency and better corporate governance.

Settings

Location:
Other setting(s):
2002

Related