Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This case is structured to resolve two interesting dilemmas: (1) should Merrill Lynch have heen saved through a merger with the Bank of America (BoA)?; and (2) what is the economic logic behind BoA's decision to take over Merrill Lynch in the midst of the US financial crisis (2008)? The case presents a brief history of Merrill Lynch and discusses the growth of Merrill Lynch, followed by its involvement in the sub-prime mortgage business. It explores the financial history of the firm in relation to mortgage-backed collateralised debt obligations (CDOs). The case presents the uncertainty created by declining housing markets and the following credit squeeze. The case describes the final attempts by the firm to survive in the tough financial conditions and the consequences that led the BoA to take over Merrill Lynch.
Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2008

About

Abstract

This case is structured to resolve two interesting dilemmas: (1) should Merrill Lynch have heen saved through a merger with the Bank of America (BoA)?; and (2) what is the economic logic behind BoA's decision to take over Merrill Lynch in the midst of the US financial crisis (2008)? The case presents a brief history of Merrill Lynch and discusses the growth of Merrill Lynch, followed by its involvement in the sub-prime mortgage business. It explores the financial history of the firm in relation to mortgage-backed collateralised debt obligations (CDOs). The case presents the uncertainty created by declining housing markets and the following credit squeeze. The case describes the final attempts by the firm to survive in the tough financial conditions and the consequences that led the BoA to take over Merrill Lynch.

Settings

Location:
Industry:
Other setting(s):
2008

Related