Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This is part of a case series. In August 2000, growing animal welfare concern prompted new regulations for domestic poultry kept for commercial purposes. These regulations included increasing the size of new battery hen cages and phasing out or modifying existing cages by 2008. It was up to each jurisdicttion how and to what extent the regulations were implemented, and by the end of 2006 South Australia had not yet introduced changes. Egg producers wanted clarity so they could decide whether to invest in new cages or exit the industry, at a time of falling egg prices, rising operational costs and increasing public concern about the treatment of livestock. This case gives detailed data for discussion of the options available to South Australian regulators, considering economic factors and changing public perceptions.

About

Abstract

This is part of a case series. In August 2000, growing animal welfare concern prompted new regulations for domestic poultry kept for commercial purposes. These regulations included increasing the size of new battery hen cages and phasing out or modifying existing cages by 2008. It was up to each jurisdicttion how and to what extent the regulations were implemented, and by the end of 2006 South Australia had not yet introduced changes. Egg producers wanted clarity so they could decide whether to invest in new cages or exit the industry, at a time of falling egg prices, rising operational costs and increasing public concern about the treatment of livestock. This case gives detailed data for discussion of the options available to South Australian regulators, considering economic factors and changing public perceptions.

Settings


Related