Subject category:
Finance, Accounting and Control
Published by:
Harvard Business Publishing
Version: 19 September 2011
Revision date: 25-Oct-2011
Length: 17 pages
Data source: Field research
Share a link:
https://casecent.re/p/95341
Write a review
|
No reviews for this item
This product has not been used yet
Abstract
Owens & Minor (O&M) performed lean inventory services for Virginia Mason (VM) as its Alpha Vendor, but the outdated industry pricing model created perverse incentives and could not capture OM's costs. Together, O&M and VM created an activity-based pricing model: Total Supply Chain Costs (TSCC), which incented both companies to be more efficient and to streamline their distribution activities. After beta testing the TSCC for one year, VM's Daniel Borunda and O&M's Michael Stefanic believed that TSCC was a better and more cost-effective pricing model, but could they convince their companies to continue to invest in TSCC?
Location:
Industry:
Size:
USD665 million (VMMC), USD7 billion (O&M), 5,000-5,300 employees
Other setting(s):
2007-2008
About
Abstract
Owens & Minor (O&M) performed lean inventory services for Virginia Mason (VM) as its Alpha Vendor, but the outdated industry pricing model created perverse incentives and could not capture OM's costs. Together, O&M and VM created an activity-based pricing model: Total Supply Chain Costs (TSCC), which incented both companies to be more efficient and to streamline their distribution activities. After beta testing the TSCC for one year, VM's Daniel Borunda and O&M's Michael Stefanic believed that TSCC was a better and more cost-effective pricing model, but could they convince their companies to continue to invest in TSCC?
Settings
Location:
Industry:
Size:
USD665 million (VMMC), USD7 billion (O&M), 5,000-5,300 employees
Other setting(s):
2007-2008