Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
Abridged version
-
Reference no. 9-110-063
Published by: Harvard Business Publishing
Originally published in: 2010
Version: 19 September 2011
Revision date: 25-Oct-2011
Length: 17 pages
Data source: Field research

Abstract

Owens & Minor (O&M) performed lean inventory services for Virginia Mason (VM) as its Alpha Vendor, but the outdated industry pricing model created perverse incentives and could not capture OM's costs. Together, O&M and VM created an activity-based pricing model: Total Supply Chain Costs (TSCC), which incented both companies to be more efficient and to streamline their distribution activities. After beta testing the TSCC for one year, VM's Daniel Borunda and O&M's Michael Stefanic believed that TSCC was a better and more cost-effective pricing model, but could they convince their companies to continue to invest in TSCC?
Location:
Size:
USD665 million (VMMC), USD7 billion (O&M), 5,000-5,300 employees
Other setting(s):
2007-2008

About

Abstract

Owens & Minor (O&M) performed lean inventory services for Virginia Mason (VM) as its Alpha Vendor, but the outdated industry pricing model created perverse incentives and could not capture OM's costs. Together, O&M and VM created an activity-based pricing model: Total Supply Chain Costs (TSCC), which incented both companies to be more efficient and to streamline their distribution activities. After beta testing the TSCC for one year, VM's Daniel Borunda and O&M's Michael Stefanic believed that TSCC was a better and more cost-effective pricing model, but could they convince their companies to continue to invest in TSCC?

Settings

Location:
Size:
USD665 million (VMMC), USD7 billion (O&M), 5,000-5,300 employees
Other setting(s):
2007-2008

Related